You can't imagine how glad I am somebody else posted in this community ! Thank you for this link. I do not know anything about the american continent prehistory so I found it really instructive. It seems that most of the researchers interviewed were a little dubious instead of enthusiat. It was quite strange since the begining of the article insisted on the fact this sort of sites were looked for for a long time. What is interesting is that the first inhabitants of the american continent did not let more "footprints". But maybe archaeologist were not looking in the right places ?
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:58 am (UTC)Thank you for this link. I do not know anything about the american continent prehistory so I found it really instructive.
It seems that most of the researchers interviewed were a little dubious instead of enthusiat. It was quite strange since the begining of the article insisted on the fact this sort of sites were looked for for a long time.
What is interesting is that the first inhabitants of the american continent did not let more "footprints". But maybe archaeologist were not looking in the right places ?